You need to watch this video series.

And I don’t often use the word ‘need’.

However, the video series I’m currently talking about is hosted by a Benedictine nun and MD who holds a PhD in Public Health. What’s she talking about?

The flu.

Just to whet your whistle, she discusses …

  • how the A-H1N1 flu is actually not a new virus
  • how the WHO changed the definition of ‘pandemic’ for 2009 (leaving out the critical part about increased mortality) and just happens to also hold political power when a ‘pandemic’ is declared
  • some inconsistencies in this years’ flu vaccination program - ie. a two-dose shot, increased amounts of untested adjuvants, and pharmaceutical companies asking for immunity from governments so as not to be held responsible should adverse reactions occur …
  • that the swine flu is, by all accounts, a more mild virus than the seasonal flu and therefore, people should be refusing vaccinations … and, the thing that got me, that if there comes to be a large increase in the numbers of people getting sick and/or dying, then it is NOT due to the swine flu and therefore  the shot won’t protect you against the new mutated strain anyways

There’s lots more to the videos (6 in all), but I can’t remember all her points. Honestly, the video series is VERY well prepared and, I found, quite grippe-ing. (I know. I’m so sorry. I couldn’t help it.) Please watch it.

Please.

3 comments »

  1. Crystle said,

    November 13, 2009 @ 10:13 am

    Kim - would you say you agree with those points you listed that she talks about? I’m unsure from your post. I’d like your professional (nurse) opinion.

  2. kim said,

    November 13, 2009 @ 7:37 pm

    I don’t really have a professional opinion, since I’m not actually a Registered Nurse … so I can’t use that title in discussing such things - especially online!

    However, my academic, scientific, & personal opinion is that these talks are done by a very knowledgeable woman who quotes only the highest source for her information - BMJ, New England Journal of Medicine, news releases, CNN, etc. From my knowledge, everything she says appears to be spot on. She did create a written document outlining most of her spoken points, but it is available in Spanish only on her website … I’ve got an email into them asking for an English translation, since it’s in that document that she gives the actual references for her talk.

    I think she’s right.

  3. Rachel said,

    November 17, 2009 @ 9:46 am

    Hmmmm. Interesting stuff. Thanks for posting Kim. I wonder why her information is not more main stream. I wish it was so I could hear other informed people’s opinions on it. I guess time will tell (like if the journalist’s charges against WHO get carried out). In the mean time, I’m pretty happy we chose not to vaccinate, and I’m really curious to see how this will all play out.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment